
If you entered Imatest on this page, you may want to explore the background information in these links.
Sharpness introduces sharpness measurements and MTF.
Sharpening describes Standardized sharpening.
How to test Lenses with Imatest contains conscise instructions on testing lenses using SFRplus.
Image quality factors lists the factors measured by Imatest.
Imatest SFR displays Edge profiles and SFR (Spatial frequency response, i.e., MTF) plots with spatial frequency labelled in
- Cycles per Pixel (C/P),
- Cycles per distance (inches or mm),
- Line Widths or Pairs per Picture Height (LW/PH or LP/PH), and/or
- Cycles per angle (milliradians or degrees)
depending on the first two checkbox settings of the Plot section of the SFR input dialog box , shown below. Note that one cycle (or line pair) is equivalent to two line widths.

Key results below are shown in Bold. The most important is MTF50, without and with Standardized sharpening. Its relationship with print quality is discussed in Interpretation of MTF50. MTF curves and Image appearance contains several examples illustrating the correlation between MTF curves and perceived sharpness. The contents of the plots are affected by whether or not Standardized sharpening is checked in Settings section of the SFR input dialog box. Differences in plot content are indicated by [Std Sharpening checked] or [Std Sharpening off].
Edge response
Upper left: Spatial domain plot |
![]() Edge profile [Standardized sharpening on] |
|||||||||||||
| Black line (bold) | Edge profile for the luminance (Y) channel, where Y = 0.3*R + 0.59*G + 0.11*B. Original (without standardized sharpening). The normalized edge profile shown on the right is proportional to the light intensity. You may also select to display the Line Spread Function (LSF; the derivative of the edge profile), shown on the right, below, or Pixel levels (which includes gamma-encoding), or Edge linear unnormalized to view the unnormalized edges, which often gives a better idea of the degree of saturation that can affect results. |
|||||||||||||
| Red line (dashed, bold) |
Edge profile for the luminance (Y) channel with standardized sharpening, indicated by (corr) for "corrected." Radius R used for setting standardized sharpening is displayed. Defaults to 2, but may set manually; may be larger for unusually broad transitions (poor MTF response). [Std Sharpening checked] | |||||||||||||
| R, G, B dashed lines (thin) |
Individual edge profiles for R, G, and B channels. Shown more prominently in the Chromatic Aberration plot, below. Barely visible in this illustration because this camera has very little chromatic aberration. Imatest Master only. | |||||||||||||
Left column text (input settings) |
|
|||||||||||||
| Right column text (results) |
|
|||||||||||||
Spatial Frequency Response (MTF)
Lower left:
Frequency domain (MTF) plot |
![]() |
||||||||
| Black line (bold) | Spatial Frequency Response (MTF) for the luminance (Y) channel. Unprocessed. MTF curves and Image appearance contains several examples illustrating the correlation between MTF curves and perceived sharpness. | ||||||||
| Red line (dashed,bold) |
Spatial Frequency Response (MTF) for the luminance (Y) channel with Standardized sharpening. [Std Sharpening checked] | ||||||||
Right column text (results) |
|
||||||||
Input data
| Right: Input data | ![]() |
|
Top right image Thumbnail of the entire image, showing the location of the selected region of interest (ROI) in red. |
||
Middle right image The selected region of interrest (ROI), shown with the correct aspect ratio, but not necessarily the exact size. The following parameters are displayed below the image.
|
||
Lower right text Selected EXIF data: metadata recorded by the digital camera. Only for JPEG files unless Phil Harvey's ExifTool (recommended) is installed. May include ISO speed, aperture, and other details. Thanks to Matthias Wandel for jhead.exe. |
||
| Deprecated result (removed from MTF plot) |
| Equivalent "ideal megapixels" in brackets [n mpxls ideal]: a number based on the concept that the "ideal" pixel would have an MTF of 1 up to the Nyquist frequency (0.5 C/P), and 0 above, and hence, MTF50 = 0.5 C/P. The number of "ideal pixels" that would yield the identical sharpness (MTF50) is, |
| 4 * MTF50(C/P horizontal) * horizontal pixels * MTF50(C/P vertical) * vertical pixels |
| The number displayed assumes that MTF50 is the same in horizontal and vertical directions— usually, but not always, a good assumption— there are exceptions, such as the Nikon D70. You should not expect the "ideal megapixel" count to equal the total megapixel count of the camera. In the real world, performance is excellent if it is half the actual megapixels. In cameras with weak anti-aliasing filters or a high degree of sharpening, MTF may be greater than 0.5 at the Nyquist frequency. In this case, [> n mpxls ideal] is displayed, where n is the total number of pixels in the camera, is displayed. Larger numbers are meaningless. Aliasing issues such as moire patterns may be present, but the simple slanted edge pattern cannot be used to evaluate the seriousness of aliasing. |





