BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Imatest - ECPv6.18.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Imatest
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.imatest.com
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Imatest
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Denver
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:MDT
DTSTART:20180311T090000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:MST
DTSTART:20181104T080000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:MDT
DTSTART:20190310T090000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:MST
DTSTART:20191103T080000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:MDT
DTSTART:20200308T090000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:MST
DTSTART:20201101T080000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20190113
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20190118
DTSTAMP:20181212T163045Z
CREATED:20181212T163045Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20181212T163045Z
UID:10000022-1547337600-1547769599@www.imatest.com
SUMMARY:Electronic Imaging Symposium 2019
DESCRIPTION:Join Imatest at the Electronic Imaging Symposium from Jan. 13 – 17 in Burlingame\, California USA. Explore the entire imaging science ecosystem\, from capture through image processing to how we and our surrogate machines see and interpret images. Henry Koren and Norman Koren will be presenting on the following. \n \nReducing the cross-lab variation of image quality metrics\nHenry Koren\n \nAs imaging test labs seek to obtain objective performance scores of camera systems\, many factors can skew the results. IEEE Camera Phone Image Quality (CPIQ) Conformity Assessment Steering Committee (CASC) working group members performed round-robin studies where an assortment of mobile devices was tested within heterogeneous imaging labs. This paper investigates how the existence of near-infrared energy in light sources that attempt to simulate CIE illuminants can influence test results. Numerous other impacts\, including the influence of opal diffusers used for uniformity testing\, how test scene framing can alter white balance and exposure\, and how chart quality and texture frequency distribution can skew results. We introduce a test procedure which is intended to reduce intra-lab variability and a method for assessing an independent lab’s competence in conforming with the IEEE testing standards.\n \nDate/Time: Tuesday January 15\, 2019\, 3:50 – 4:10\nLocation: Grand Peninsula Ballroom E\n \n \nCompensating MTF measurements for Chart Quality limitations\nNorman Koren\n \nObjective measurements of imaging system sharpness are typically derived from test chart images. It is generally assumed that if testing instructions are followed—if the chart print quality is fine enough and the chart magnification (on the sensor) is low enough—  test chart quality will have little impact on the overall measurement.\n \nThis assumption may not be valid when extremely high-resolution cameras are tested with standard charts or when smaller than optimum test charts are used because of laboratory or production line space limitations.\n \nMTF compensation is applied by dividing the measured system MTF by chart-projected MTF as a function of the sensor.\n\nMeasurements made under different conditions— with different test charts (transmissive as well as reflective) by different people in different labs— are more consistent.\nThe megapixel suitability of test charts is increased by a factor of approximately 2 (1.4x linearly).\nThe key advantage of MTF compensation is that measurements are more accurate (in an absolute sense).\n\n \nDate/Time: Tuesday January 15\, 2019\, 9:10am\nLocation: Grand Peninsula Ballroom E
URL:https://www.imatest.com/event/electronic-imaging-symposium-2019/
LOCATION:CA
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/AdobeStock_116545185-e1544633572233.jpeg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR