<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Chrome on Glass &#8211; Imatest</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.imatest.com/tag/chrome-on-glass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.imatest.com</link>
	<description>Image Quality Testing Software &#38; Test Charts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2022 02:38:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Testing a macro lens using Checkerboard and Micro Multi-slide</title>
		<link>https://www.imatest.com/2016/12/testing-macro-lens-using-checkerboard-micro-multi-slide/</link>
					<comments>https://www.imatest.com/2016/12/testing-macro-lens-using-checkerboard-micro-multi-slide/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry Koren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Imaging Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome on Glass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macro]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imatest.com/?p=17382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Imatest’s Checkerboard module is our new flagship module for automated analysis of sharpness, distortion and chromatic aberration from a checkerboard (AKA chessboard) pattern. The big benefit of using the checkerboard is that there are looser framing requirements than with other kinds of test targets. While checkerboard lacks the color and tone analysis provided by SFRplus and eSFR ISO, these features are not available on the high precision chrome on glass substrate, so the checkerboard is the optimal pattern for this test.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.imatest.com/2016/12/testing-macro-lens-using-checkerboard-micro-multi-slide/">Testing a macro lens using Checkerboard and Micro Multi-slide</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.imatest.com">Imatest</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Testing a 1-5x Macro Canon MP‑E 65mm Lens</h2>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Imatest&#8217;s <a href="https://docs.imatest.com/docs/checkerboard_instructions" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Checkerboard module</a> is our new flagship module for automated analysis of <a href="https://www.imatest.com/solutions/sharpness/">sharpness</a>, <a href="https://www.imatest.com/solutions/distortion/">distortion</a> and <a href="https://www.imatest.com/solutions/chromatic-aberration/">chromatic aberration</a> from a checkerboard (AKA chessboard) pattern. The big benefit of using the checkerboard is that there are looser framing requirements than with other kinds of test targets. While checkerboard lacks the color and tone analysis provided by <a href="https://www.imatest.com/products/test-charts-sfrplus/">SFRplus</a> and <a href="https://www.imatest.com/products/test-charts-iso-standard/">eSFR ISO</a>, these features are not available on the high precision <a href="https://www.imatest.com/2013/09/transmissive-chart-quality-comparison/#CG">chrome on glass</a> substrate, so the checkerboard is the optimal pattern for this test.</span><span id="more-17382"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Imatest </span><a href="https://www.imatest.com/product/micro-multi-slide-dot-pattern-and-checkerboard-chart/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Micro Multi-Slide</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> contains high precision checkerboard patterns with many different scales of frequencies. This makes a single target capable of effectively testing a wide range of magnifications.</span></p>
<p>We obtained the below cycles per object mm by dividing the LW/PH obtained from the image by 2*image height in mm.</p>
<table style="width: 521px; height: 133px;" border="1">
<tbody>
<tr style="height: 22px;">
<td style="height: 22px; width: 118px; text-align: center;"><strong>Magnification</strong></td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 141px; text-align: center;"><strong>Image height</strong></td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 233px; text-align: center;"><strong>Center MTF50</strong></td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 171px; text-align: center;"><strong>Best Aperture</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 22px;">
<td style="height: 22px; width: 118px; text-align: center;">1x</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 141px; text-align: center;">23.71 mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 233px; text-align: center;">29.61 cycles / object mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 171px; text-align: center;">f/5.6</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 22px;">
<td style="height: 22px; width: 118px; text-align: center;">2x</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 141px; text-align: center;">11.86 mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 233px; text-align: center;">57.04 cycles / object mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 171px; text-align: center;">f/5.6</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 22px;">
<td style="height: 22px; width: 118px; text-align: center;">3x</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 141px; text-align: center;">7.90 mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 233px; text-align: center;">74.55 cycles / object mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 171px; text-align: center;">f/5.6</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 22px;">
<td style="height: 22px; width: 118px; text-align: center;">4x</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 141px; text-align: center;">6.07 mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 233px; text-align: center;">81.52 cycles / object mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 171px; text-align: center;">f/4</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 22px;">
<td style="height: 22px; width: 118px; text-align: center;">5x</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 141px; text-align: center;">4.74 mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 233px; text-align: center;">87.61 cycles / object mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 171px; text-align: center;">f/4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Thanks to this study, we now know to select the f/4 aperture at 5x magnification to maximize the resolving power of this lens. Detailed results, capture and analysis procedures are available below.</p>
<hr />
<h3>1x Magnification</h3>
<p>This report is shown in line widths per picture height (LW/PH):</p>
<h3><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-17417 aligncenter" src="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/1x.png" alt="1x" width="680" height="388" srcset="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/1x.png 1000w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/1x-300x171.png 300w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/1x-600x342.png 600w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/1x-768x438.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /></h3>
<p><img decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-17416 aligncenter" src="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/1x-3d.gif" alt="1x-3d" width="536" height="600" /></p>
<hr />
<h3><span style="font-weight: 400;">2x Magnification</span></h3>
<h3><img decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-17419 aligncenter" src="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2x.png" alt="2x" width="680" height="388" srcset="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2x.png 1000w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2x-300x171.png 300w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2x-600x342.png 600w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2x-768x438.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /></h3>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-17418 aligncenter" src="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2x-3d.gif" alt="2x-3d" width="536" height="600" /></p>
<hr />
<h3><span style="font-weight: 400;">3x Magnification</span></h3>
<h3><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-17421 aligncenter" src="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/3x.png" alt="3x" width="680" height="388" srcset="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/3x.png 1000w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/3x-300x171.png 300w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/3x-600x342.png 600w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/3x-768x438.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /></h3>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-17420 aligncenter" src="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/3x-3d.gif" alt="3x-3d" width="536" height="600" /></p>
<hr />
<h3><span style="font-weight: 400;">4x Magnification</span></h3>
<h3><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-17423 aligncenter" src="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/4x.png" alt="4x" width="680" height="388" srcset="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/4x.png 1000w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/4x-300x171.png 300w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/4x-600x342.png 600w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/4x-768x438.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /></h3>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-17422 aligncenter" src="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/4x-3d.gif" alt="4x-3d" width="536" height="600" /></p>
<hr />
<h3><span style="font-weight: 400;">5x Magnification</span></h3>
<p>At the limit of this lens&#8217; magnification we obtain the most spatial detail on the target at f/4</p>
<h3><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-17425 aligncenter" src="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/5x.png" alt="5x" width="680" height="388" srcset="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/5x.png 1000w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/5x-300x171.png 300w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/5x-600x342.png 600w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/5x-768x438.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /></h3>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-17424 aligncenter" src="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/5x-3d.gif" alt="5x-3d" width="536" height="600" /></p>
<hr />
<h3><span style="font-weight: 400;">Capture Procedure</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We use this camera setup to take high precision photographs of the test targets on a LED lightbox:  </span></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-17431" src="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/MicroMulti_Setup_scaled.jpg" alt="micromulti_setup_scaled" width="511" height="560" srcset="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/MicroMulti_Setup_scaled.jpg 640w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/MicroMulti_Setup_scaled-300x329.jpg 300w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/MicroMulti_Setup_scaled-600x658.jpg 600w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/MicroMulti_Setup_scaled-274x300.jpg 274w" sizes="(max-width: 511px) 100vw, 511px" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We mounted the camera on an adjustable arm and used a Manfrotto 454 Micro Positioning plate for adjusting distance and focus. We masked off the extra parts of the lightbox using opaque material to prevent additional stray light from increasing flare.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We used the following framing for the various magnifications:</span></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-17430" src="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/micromulti_site_blog_customized-1.png" alt="micromulti_site_blog_customized" width="800" height="456" srcset="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/micromulti_site_blog_customized-1.png 800w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/micromulti_site_blog_customized-1-300x171.png 300w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/micromulti_site_blog_customized-1-600x342.png 600w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/micromulti_site_blog_customized-1-768x438.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">To get <a href="https://www.imatest.com/2016/08/increasing-repeatability-of-sharpness-tests/">good sharpness measurements</a> we selected an area of the slide that had under 10 vertical squares in the image. This yields a reasonably large SFR region for the most reliable calculations and prevents there from being an excessive number of regions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We centered the chart on the 3-dot mark in the center of the frequency zone. For optimal slanted-edge analysis, we rotated the chart by about 5° according to the </span><a href="https://www.imatest.com/solutions/iso-12233/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ISO 12233</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> standard. Our current checkerboard routines can automatically detect the checkerboard, but they look for complete rows and columns before including the set of regions. Which means that rotation can make the framing a little more difficult, and if a corner of a complete row/column of squares gets clipped off, then the automatic region detection will skip some regions you may have wanted to test, producing less than optimal region availability around the periphery of your image. We will be improving these selection routines in future releases of our software.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"> If we wanted more detail about lateral chromatic aberration and distortion (which are very low for this lens) we would have analyzed the </span><a href="https://docs.imatest.com/docs/dot-pattern" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">dot pattern</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> regions of the chart.</span></p>
<p>We used 5 megapixel downsampled JPG&#8217;s from the camera to perform this analysis, which gives us the following table of image sizes:</p>
<table style="width: 365px; height: 133px;" border="1">
<tbody>
<tr style="height: 22px;">
<td style="height: 22px; width: 118px;"><strong>Magnification</strong></td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 103px;"><strong>Image height</strong></td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 143px;"><strong>Image pixel size</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 22px;">
<td style="height: 22px; width: 118px;">1x</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 103px;">23.71mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 143px;">13µm</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 22px;">
<td style="height: 22px; width: 118px;">2x</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 103px;">11.86mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 143px;">6.5µm</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 22px;">
<td style="height: 22px; width: 118px;">3x</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 103px;">7.90mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 143px;">4.33µm</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 22px;">
<td style="height: 22px; width: 118px;">3.9x</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 103px;">6.07mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 143px;">3.33µm</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 22px;">
<td style="height: 22px; width: 118px;">5x</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 103px;">4.74mm</td>
<td style="height: 22px; width: 143px;">2.6µm</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3><span style="font-weight: 400;">Analysis Procedure</span></h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We performed our <a href="https://docs.imatest.com/docs/rescharts_instructions2#paramwindow" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Checkerboard Setup</a> and selected all regions:</span></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-17428" src="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/setup-1024x739.png" alt="setup" width="640" height="462" srcset="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/setup-1024x739.png 1024w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/setup-300x217.png 300w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/setup-600x433.png 600w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/setup-768x555.png 768w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/setup.png 1148w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">After initially determining our range of expected MTF values, we disabled auto-scaling on our 3D plots and set our range to the total:</span></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-17427" src="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/MicroMultiScaling.png" alt="micromultiscaling" width="832" height="470" srcset="https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/MicroMultiScaling.png 832w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/MicroMultiScaling-300x169.png 300w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/MicroMultiScaling-600x339.png 600w, https://www.imatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/MicroMultiScaling-768x434.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 832px) 100vw, 832px" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We used Imatest <a href="https://docs.imatest.com/docs/batchview" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Batchview</a> to coalesce the large volume of tests in order to produce the above bar graphs.  We also used </span><a href="https://www.imagemagick.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ImageMagick</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> to assemble the nifty animated GIF’s from the collections of 3D plots:</span></p>
<p><code><span style="font-weight: 400;">convert -delay 100 mag1/Results/*3D.png 1x-3D.gif</span></code></p>
<p>We hope that you find this write-up to be helpful in testing your own equipment. You can purchase <a href="https://www.imatest.com/product/micro-multi-slide-dot-pattern-and-checkerboard-chart/">Micro-multi Slide</a> on our store or contact <a href="mailto:charts@imatest.com">charts@imatest.com</a> for customizing a test target that fits your unique requirements.  See our <a href="https://www.imatest.com/solutions/macro/">Macro Solutions</a> for other close-range testing items.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.imatest.com/2016/12/testing-macro-lens-using-checkerboard-micro-multi-slide/">Testing a macro lens using Checkerboard and Micro Multi-slide</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.imatest.com">Imatest</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.imatest.com/2016/12/testing-macro-lens-using-checkerboard-micro-multi-slide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
